Medicine in the NEWS 
The future of Primary Care Practices 
Few US Medical Student Chose Internal Medicine / Primary Care Path
Medical students are shying away from careers in general internal medicine, which could exacerbate the U.S. doctor shortage expected by the time the youngest Baby Boomers head into their senior years, researchers report today.

Only 2% of 1,177 respondents to a survey of students at 11 U.S. medical schools said they planned to pursue careers in general internal medicine, according to the new study.

General internists provide a large portion of care for older and chronically ill patients, the authors write in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Yet, the rate of medical students opting for general internal medicine is declining as the number of older adults rises, they write.

According to one estimate, the USA will have 200,000 fewer doctors overall than it needs by 2020, according to the new report. Meanwhile, the number of older Americans is expected to nearly double between 2005 and 2030.
Many medical students are turned off by the thought of caring for chronically ill patients and the amount of paperwork general internists must deal with, says lead author Karen Hauer, a general internist on the faculty of the University of California-San Francisco.

"They rated the intellectual aspects of the field highly, and they rated continuity of care appealing," Hauer says. "When you put the whole package together, it's too hard."

On top of the workload, a "research letter" in the same issue of JAMA as Hauer's study ranked internal medicine as one of the lowest-paid medical specialties.

Members of the medical school class of 2007 graduated with an average debt of $140,000, writes Mark Ebell, a family practice doctor at the University of Georgia.

That's $5,000 higher than the average starting salary of internists that year, according to Ebell, who didn't separate the more lucrative internal medicine sub-specialties, such as cardiology and gastroenterology, from general internal medicine.

Radiologists topped Ebell's list, with a starting salary of $350,000, not to mention, Hauer notes, more regular hours than general internists.

Their amount of debt didn't seem to influence their choice of specialty in her survey, Hauer says.

Rather students focused more on quality of life factors such as income and work hours, which did steer them away from general internal medicine.

Medicare and its payment of doctors 
What Should Medicare Pay Doctors

With the continual concerns that medicare will cut payment to physicians by as much at 21% it is interesting to understand so background.

Here is an interesting historical perspective of how medicare payment of doctors was planned at its creation.  It clearly had good intentions of providing care for Americans but in the past clearly a few have abused system on both the sides of the government and on the side physicians.  And now the current group of physicans and patients suffer.  The text is pasted directly below however,
here is the orignal link to the NPR article 
and at the very bottom find NPR audio recording as well. 

I learned something and it provides good knowledge for thought and discussion. - M.Lewis 

How Should Medicare Pay Doctors?

February 26, 2010

Medicare payments to doctors will fall by 21 percent starting on Monday, but Congress may soon act to block the cut. It's the latest reminder of a chronic problem for the federal government: figuring out how to pay doctors who treat Medicare patients.

The story goes all the way back to 1965, when the federal government was about to launch Medicare ? the health-insurance plan for the elderly.

The idea of a government-run health-insurance plan made doctors nervous, and Lyndon Johnson's administration was worried that doctors wouldn't take Medicare patients. So Joseph Califano, Johnson's adviser for domestic affairs, made what seemed like a small concession: Medicare would pay doctors whatever they thought was reasonable.

That worked out well for doctors. They had been providing lots of free care for old people, and they started getting paid whatever they asked for, as long as it wasn't wildly out of line with what others were charging.

"We found what the general fee for a service was and charged that or maybe added 10 percent, because of course I'm better than average," says Lucian Leape, who was a practicing surgeon at the time. "So it was an incentive for doctors to charge what they thought was reasonable for them, and then of course to increase it every year by, say, 5 or 10 percent."

Within two years, Johnson's advisers saw that the amount Medicare was paying doctors was rising far more quickly than had been anticipated. They wanted to Congress to change the payment structure. But doctors, who had a lot of sway with Congress, found they liked the payment system. So the system stayed in place for decades, as medicine got more expensive.

Then, in 1986, a Harvard economist named William Hsiao decided to figure out a better way to pay doctors. He thought he could figure out the right price for each and every thing a doctor does.

To do that, Hsiao had to answer what sound like philosophical questions: How much mental work goes into performing a colonoscopy? How does a regular checkup compare to doing brain surgery? He brought doctors in and had them rate everything they did in relation to one reference point. For surgeons, the reference might be a hernia repair: How technically hard is it, how stressful, how many supplies? And they'd assign a certain number of units to each procedure.

Hsiao had doctors do this for thousands of procedures.

Congress loved the idea of an economist answering this annoying question in what seemed like a rational way. And lawmakers said that if his research panned out, they'd use his pay scale as the basis for Medicare payments to doctors.

That got doctors' attention. They hired consultants, who did their own research about how much doctors should be paid for each service.

"So then they were trying to trump us," Hsiao says. The consultants said Hsiao's work was not valid. "And then we have to explain why we think our results are valid and more accurate," he says.

In 1992, Congress adopted Hsiao's physician-payment scale, and it worked ? but only for a few years.

There are different explanations for what happened. Hsiao blames lobbyists. Lobbyists and doctors say health care is just expensive, and most of the time Medicare actually underpays doctors.

Congress tried to slow the growth of doctor pay by saying total payments to doctors could not grow faster than the overall economy. When the total amount Medicare was paying to doctors grew faster than the overall economy, the rates for each procedure and service were supposed to be cut.

But doctors, naturally, lobbied against letting those cuts take effect. And Congress passed short-term measures, again and again, blocking the planned cuts. That's where things stand now ? cuts about to kick in, doctors lobbying Congress to block the cuts and no clear answer for the best way to pay them.

<a href="http://po.b5z.net/i/u/10018177/m/NPR_Medicare_Payment.mp3">Play the media using the stand alone Player</a>

North Scottsdale Internal Medicine
8575 E. Princess Dr., Suite 109
Scottsdale, Arizona 85255
(480) 502 - 9355 phone
(480) 502 - 6017 fax

Add us to your smart phone...quick scan this...

Copyright 2008 © North Scottsdale Internal Medicine. All Rights Reserved.

Important disclaimer: The information on this site, including on www.nsmedicine.com is provided as a supportive service to North Scottsdale Internal Medicine and Mark J Lewis, MD, PLC and is not meant to replace the advice of the physician who cares for you. All medical advice and information should be considered to be incomplete without a physical exam, which is not possible without a visit to your doctor.

Powered by Sitebuilder